A series of emails in early April on the listserv of the Kappa Sigma fraternity has sparked significant campus outrage due to content described by many students as “homophobic.” According to Kappa Sig member Ben Halpern ‘11, four members of Kappa Sig have now chosen to deactivate from the fraternity over the exchange.
Elsewhere on campus, condemnations of the language have circulated on various other community email lists. The incident may also prove to have broader political implications, as one of the Kappa Sig members responsible for the outrage has ties to prominent political figures with notable pro-gay and lesbian positions.
The episode began with an email from Jonathan Anderson ’11, which requested that members of the fraternity “stop sending out messages with the word fag in them.” In the message, Anderson explained, “I know it’s not meant to be derogatory against gay people, but it does bother me.” The message was followed by an email from Bert McBride ’10, which read, “Delayed April Fools?”
Soon afterward, at least three members of the fraternity issued statements of deactivation on the Kappa Sig listserv. Zack Wettstein, who started the chain of deactivations, noted in his response to McBride, “I’m ashamed to be considered your ‘brother,’ let alone associated with you at all.”
Halpern, another Kappa Sig that has deactivated, indicated that McBride had made no attempts to reach out to him to discuss the situation, stating, “I haven’t heard from Bert.” McBride did send out an apologetic email to the fraternity’s email list, stating, “Sorry about that, the intent was never to offend but to merely be humorous.”
When asked about the incident, McBride declined to comment.
Political Implications?
The episode quickly received the attention of the Inter-Fraternity Council and the University. However, the email exchange may have greater implications still. McBride, the author of the “April Fools” email, is the son of two high-profile Democratic politicians in Florida.
His father, attorney Bill McBride, ran for governor of Florida in 2002, and his mother, Alex Sink, the state’s Chief Financial Officer, is the likely Democratic nominee for governor in the 2010 election. According to the St. Petersburg Times, Sink trails the front-runner, Republican State Attorney General Bill McCollum, by just 4 points in a Quinnipiac University poll conducted April 8 to 13. The poll indicated that McCollum has failed to gain significant support from independents in the state. Differences in campaign proposals, such as those on education reform, have continued to differentiate the candidates as campaigning heats up.
Another such divergence in policy views has emerged around a Florida law that bans gays and lesbians from adopting children. At a campaign event in November 2009 with Florida’s largest gay rights group, Sink advocated for the right of homosexuals to adopt children. McCollum, on the other hand, has defended the state ban on gay adoption. As the two candidates have sought to attract independents, the issues have become increasingly important. According to the Miami Herald, “Sink’s speech at the Equality Florida fundraiser comes as she tries to chart a politically moderate path to the governor’s mansion in 2010.”
When reached on Wednesday, the Sink campaign declined to comment on her son’s remarks on the Kappa Sig listserv.
Campus Responses
Back on campus, student reactions have been overwhelmingly negative, especially within the queer community. On the Diaspora email listserv, Aria Florant remarked that the episode served as “proof that hate crimes still happen on this campus.”
On QNet, the primary LGBT campus listserv, Kyle O’Malley ’13, a staff member at the LGBT community center and Stanford Review staff writer, noted past instances of possible homophobia at Kappa Sig: “I have seen people turned away at the door of some of Sigma’s parties, simply because, in the words of one of your ‘brothers’ they ‘looked like f**s.’”
While comments were consistently critical, some saw the potential for progress. Sam King, co-chair of the Queer-Straight Alliance, noted the possible benefits of the discussion that has emerged: “If frats will respond to embarrassment, it seems as though public discussions like these are a significant way to make progress.”
According to Kappa Sigma’s grand master, Harris Brown ‘11, the fraternity has been working to deal with the results of the email exchange. “The issues raised on the email thread must be first dealt with through the appropriate channel, that being internally within our organization,” said Brown. “Throughout the past weeks, we have been working directly with the individuals involved, our organization, and the University. This process will continue until the concerns have been properly addressed.”
University officials have also begun taking steps to resolve the situation. Sally Dickson, Associate Vice Provost and Dean of Educational Resources, stated, “This matter has been brought to our attention and we are working closely with the students involved.”
According to the Vice Provost for Student Affairs website, Dickson is intricately involved in the administration of the Acts of Intolerance Protocol, which is a “mechanism for addressing situations involving a real or perceived act of intolerance.” When asked whether she foresaw the possibility of punishment handed down, Dickson said, “The protocol states that ‘engaging in constitutionally protected expressive activities will not subject a student to discipline under the Fundamental Standard.’”
Potential reputational consequences for the Kappa Sigma fraternity and political consequences for the Sink campaign, however, remain yet to be seen.
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
Although it’s well-known that McBride is Sink’s son, this is the first that a news outlet has chosen to report that fact. Why? Because it has no correlation. The Daily reported this two weeks ago and no one in the Florida media picked up on it. It’s a non-issue, but by putting the McBride-Sink connection out there, the Review is trying to influence discourse.
I wonder what the decision would have been if Sink was a Republican instead of a Democrat.
okay bert way to shadow-puppet respond and defend your family. quit being a homophobe and drop out already k thnx.
and for the record, I -still- hope the republican loses in florida’s gubernatorial race, even though you’ve been an ass
As an LGBT activist and recent Stanford alumn who knows most of the people quoted in this article and is a Florida voter, I find the notion that the kappa-sig list-serve is going to sway the florida election to be idiotic. This article would have been interesting enough and less bizarre if the author had not tried to make such a attention-mongering stretch. Also, the acts of intolerance committee does next to nothing on campus.
What surprised me most was the support shown by the number of guys who deactivated in response to the bigoted email. Kudos to those guys. Stanford continues to become more progressive each year on LGBT issues and I hope the leadership at Kappa Sig will continue to move in the direction of inclusion.
Aria Florant remarked that the episode served as “proof that hate crimes still happen on this campus.”
Really?? Since when did the comment “delayed April fools” turn into a crime? Some remarks are insensitive, but its certainly nowhere close to illegal. Let’s reserve the term hate crime for stuff that is actually hateful and criminal.
Did anyone consider that Bert sent out the mail not as a homophobic remark, but as a comment on the fact that a house issue was being dealt with in an email. I’m not sure, but I could see the email being sent in response to the tone of the email and not its subject matter
I think there is a fine line between insensativity and oversensitivity, and comparing this to a ‘hate crime’ demonstrates that we have moved toward the latter. The LGBT community is widely embraced at Stanford, and I highly doubt that McBride or any other members of Kappa Sig truely hold any anti-gay beliefs. Everybody has made an insensitive comment at some point in their life.
In my opinion, when special interests groups are oversensitive, it turns people off and detracts from their cause. For example, every time I hear Jesse Jackson speak, I am noticabley less sympathetic to modern civil rights initiatives. Similarly, LGBTs endure a lot of adversity through their life, but comparing a minor email to ‘hate crime’ marginalizes their pain.
{ 2 trackbacks }