The Road to Wellness

by Jordan Carr on February 19, 2010

Mental health is a delicate and serious issue. In fact, mental health, safety, and the concept of “wellness” – loosely defined as “being healthy physically and mentally” – have been central to the current ASSU Executive’s presidency. As such, the ASSU Exec sponsored “Wellness Week,” footing an almost $1000 bill, which, according to Jen Hawkins, the Co-Chair of Undergraduate Health and Wellness, went toward “advertising, bracelets, prizes, and the use of Braun Lecture Hall.”

One central component of the week was a competition that challenged participants to complete as many of 38 wellness activities as possible. Some of the week’s activities were to be done on your own. These included the banal (“smile at a stranger”), the embarrassing (“give yourself a manicure of pedicure”), to the exceedingly personal and potentially offensive (“have sex or masturbate”).

As soon as I heard how silly so many of the activities were, I knew I had to do it and write about my experiences for posterity’s sake, especially with the added bonus that there would be cash prizes ($100 to the winner, $75 and $50 to second and third respectively) awarded to the people who self-report the highest participation in an online survey.

The nine official Wellness events tended to fall into two categories. In the first category were events that placed an emphasis on feeling more “well.” Pretty much all the solo activities fall into this category as well. Events included yoga, meditation, and interacting with puppies and kittens (which raised funds for the Pets in Need). After such events, it would seem to be rude and in poor taste to say, “No, I don’t really feel any better.” And yet, sometimes that was the case—and thus I was forced to lie when asked at just about every happy event I attended, “How are you feeling?”

The great irony here is that much of the point of Wellness Week and modern approaches to mental health rely heavily on reducing stigma and allowing people to feel comfortable seeking help and expressing themselves freely, yet these situations provide a rather sharp stigma toward those who are not enjoying themselves.

In the second category were the events that left the impression that just about everyone around you has a mental illness and is very effective at hiding it. In fact, you may even have a mental illness that has not been diagnosed yet.

STAMP delivered a set of monologues on Thursday that would fall into that category. In it, students performed Stanford students’ anonymously submitted monologues dealing with mental health issues.

The story arc of the first three stories was essentially: 1) things were not going well for me, 2) I was diagnosed with a mental illness, and 3) I took some pills that have, to a degree neutralized, the symptoms of my mental illness.

These were much more depressing than the following monologues which dealt with people who were accepting of the fact that they had sometimes debilitating mental illnesses, but that they would do their best to control and overcome their symptoms.

Again, this event was followed by a question and answer wherein there really is only one proper response as to how they made you feel—“relieved I don’t have to deal with mental illness” would unquestionably be insensitive.

While there are indeed circumstances where stigmatizing wide ranges of emotions is appropriate (joking about anything at a funeral is obviously inappropriate), too much of Wellness Week revolved around situations where feeling outside a certain range of emotions was inappropriate.

The transition from the STAMP monologues to the Wellness Room Party, which overlapped on Thursday night was particularly jarring. There is a rather sharp disconnect between going to hear about a student’s rather tragic struggle with depression or bipolar disorder and going to a finger paint-adorned, beanbag chair-festooned room with students in a massage train, and ASSU President David Gobaud declaring that “puppies” were the only thing that would make the event better.

All told, I probably spent about 15 hours on Wellness Week-related activities, and presumably I will be reimbursed $100 for winning first prize for participating the most, with second and third place participants (very likely my two other compatriots who kept me company on a number of these missions) receiving $75 and $50 each. At times Wellness Week was enjoyable, as it can be nice to get out of one’s comfort zone.

Coming into Wellness Week, I basically expected I would get a few laughs at the silliness of tasks such as getting a pedicure, talking to myself in a mirror Stuart Smalley-style, and reading a children’s book. Despite my criticisms of it, my experience with Wellness Week was on the whole positive, though I could not imagine participating at this level again.

I petted cacti. I heard Fred Luskin give a rather informative talk on how important it is to have perspective on things. I met Pavel, a yoga instructor who learned yoga in Soviet Russia where they called it “mind control exercises” to hide the religious connotations of “yoga.” These were all good.

But the week as a whole was not all positive. As Wellness Week organizer Jen Hawkins told me, the goal of the week was to “get students to take a more active role in ensuring their own well being.” I came into Wellness Week with expectations and biases that prevent me from pretending I can fairly answer that question. But I must say I was disappointed in the dichotomous nature of the events, where the only two expected emotional states were either extreme happiness or extreme sadness and sobriety. It is difficult to improve one’s emotional state in circumstances where the honest expression of emotions is subtly discouraged.

For more stories on all 38 Wellness Week activities, visit Fiat Lux, The Stanford Review’s blog, at http://blog.stanfordreview.org.

Petting puppies from a local sheleter was one of the most popular ASSU Wellness Week activities. (Photo Credit: Sylvie Greenberg / The Stanford Review)

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Steven February 22, 2010 at 1:36 pm

I don’t like that there’s so little acknowledgment here that it’s possible for somebody else to have the complete opposite experience during the week. I, for one, thought the week was wonderful. The Wellness party in particular was one of the most relaxing, enjoyable evenings I had during a stressful week. Across the different events, I met a lot of cool people interested in studying happiness and promoting wellness on campus. Is the value that I and others got out of this week so insignificant compared to the silliness you saw in it to condemn it in such sweeping terms?

Wellness Week is not about forcing people to be happy or to put people in situations where they’re lying about their emotional state. Of course not every event is going to be perfectly calibrated to every person and how he or she is feeling at that moment, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be held. The idea is that everybody could find one or two things this week that they really enjoyed or from which they gained valuable insight.

So you didn’t like the puppies, the wellness party, or the STAMP monologues. It seems that “rather informative” is the highest praise you give to any of the events, so perhaps you found Fred’s talk valuable. That’s fine: different events are going to be rewarding for different people. I also don’t see what’s so extremely emotionally dichotomous about listening to a lecture, getting a massage, watching a movie and talking about it, doing yoga, or meditating. In fact it seems more like there were two or three events that didn’t suit you while the vast majority of them meet your criteria for acceptability. Why, then, is it that this article all about the failures downsides to the week with three sentences about how it was good?

Wellness Week is a community-level event designed to raise awareness and provide resources to the student body as a whole. If at one or two of the “happy” events you as an individual felt it was inappropriate to express sadness, hopefully as part of this week you gained knowledge about campus resources where you can always go if you’re feeling emotionally conflicted, like the Bridge or CAPS. Feeling troubled among happy people is a tough experience, but I’m pretty sure if you did reach out and ask for sympathy at any of the wellness week events, there would be a much kinder, caring, supportive ethos present than you’ll find among any other group of strangers. I’m just saying the intention of openness and supportiveness permeated the week and its events, and I’m sorry it didn’t come through well enough that you could feel comfortable talking about your feelings.

As a campus we have the potential to be happier and healthier, and efforts like Wellness Week are some of the only ways to raise awareness and provide information and resources on a large scale. On the other end of the “dichotomy” is raising awareness of mental illness and struggling on a campus that so often pretends it isn’t there. On this campus we’ve had suicides; we’ve had many involuntary hospitalizations. Mental illness is a major issue that affects a lot of people in big ways, and the more we talk about it as a community, the less stigmatized and silenced people who are really struggling will feel. So yes, these are intense issues to grapple with and they’re not always easy, but talking about the hard problems we face is part of fostering an open and well community. STAMP’s performances and the SPoM panels would have been ideal places to

You obviously have some ideas of your own about how things could get at those goals better next time, so if you care enough to go to every event and write at length about this week, why not get involved next time in planning? Maybe with your wisdom and perspective on these issues, all the event planners (who did their best to make this week as successful as possible) could better create the openness that you’re looking for in wellness events of the future?

2 Steven February 23, 2010 at 7:36 pm

Sorry my comment got a little bit cut off there, but the gist comes through.

I’m seriously and totally open to continuing to talk about this, so if there’s anything that anybody has to say that might contribute to making Stanford a mentally healthier and happier place, please let me know. “stevoc stanford edu at”

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }