Stanford Dean of Undergraduate Admissions Calls Out Princeton Review

Well, I’ll let you read the full story over at the Stanford Dish, but any story that describes a mistake so egregious that it makes Dean Richard Shaw “gnash his teeth” deserved a little more play: the Princeton Review mistakenly listed Stanford’s acceptance rate as double its true level (16 percent instead of 7.3 percent). I think that my edition of the Princeton Review from several years ago might actually be the other mistaken edition (as it also listed a relatively high acceptance rate for some reason); it’s really strange that the people at the Review couldn’t get it together to do basic due diligence (and, once the mistake was pointed out, basic copy-editing). Ah well, maybe had they come from Stanford instead…

Related Articles

Make Stanford Safe Again

Students are outraged over new alcohol policy that clearly does not take the majority opinion into account. Since it was

Should We Replace our As, Bs, and Cs?

This article is the third of a three-part series. The first established the background of grade inflation at different schools,

UA-140492650-2 UA-140492650-1